Oct. 23rd, 2007

redsage: (Default)
If any of my friends or their friends & family need a place to crash fleeing the SoCal wildfires, I have room for several people.
redsage: (delicious fruits)
If you remember reading some of my Arse Elektronika posts, you'll remember that I posted about the horrible invasions involved in 2257 regulations. Turns out, the government agrees they're bad!


2257 is Unconstitutional!
A federal appeals court has ruled today that the 2257 record keeping laws that have beleagured the adult industry for years now are in direct violation of First Amendment rights, specifically in regard to the definition of "sexually explicit conduct". As you know, this language has been spookily ... nay, ridiculously vague in keeping porn makers and the wide variety of so-called "secondary producers" on their toes; when you never categorically know what you're doing is against the law, it becomes just another scare tactic to keep porn peeps afraid that they're doing something wrong.

As we've explained, 2257 was a piece of law that was added to the Adam Walsh Child Obscenity Act of 1988. Ostensibly "for the children", it put a good number of law abiding porn businesses out of business, did nothing to protect any children, and made it seem as though anything could be "sexually explicit conduct". Let's just hope that if push comes to shove after this and it's taken up on review, our *cough* open-minded Supreme Court jutsices care more about the First Amendment than using strongarm tactics to intimidate law-abiding porn makers—and that someone reminds them that last time we checked, it's still legal to make porn here in the good old US of A.


Full PDF text of ruling here.

Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] rhiannonstone for the info. YAY!

September 2013

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
151617 18192021
22232425262728
2930     

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 9th, 2025 01:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios